Re: [公告] 回應 circlelee 推文及於 PttLaw 之申訴
看板Anti-ramp (非好店)作者circlelee (牛仔褲精神)時間18年前 (2008/08/09 06:12)推噓-134(2推 136噓 100→)留言238則, 86人參與討論串3/12 (看更多)
前文恕刪…
板主問題如下
當然,形式上 ta29 及 chinsummer 皆已揭露其姓名,惟若後者僅推文說:
「大家請看乙看板精華區」,因畢竟於該看板中,ID對照表屬於早已公開之個
人資料,若將早已公開之個人資料揭露者,仍認為此係應予處罰,各位板友認為
如此是否妥當?換句話說,我們是否應該處罰一個揭露已揭露之資訊的人?這是
在下第一個困惑之處,想請教大家。
我就這個問題,跟大家分享一下意見
1
基本常識皆知,在ptt上任何一個板都不能未經同意就公開個人訊息的
這是嚴重地破壞個人隱私行為!如果出現的話,該板板主一定是立刻刪文
如果留著不刪,等於也是讓破壞隱私行為繼續惡化下去…
2
多年前在ntuchess板的出現我的名字是 有經我同意過的
而ta29 chinsummer則是的把我名字惡意在此板公開,根本沒問過我
這個問題應不在於揭露已揭露之資訊的人
而是 有沒有經過我的同意的問題…
3
一方面是為我自己的隱私
另一方面是為板主治板著想
請板主立刻刪除該文章
並嚴懲ta29與chinsummer之違規行為
否則板主恐有失職之慮,公開時間愈久板主可能失職就愈嚴重
根據
購物名店街組務版 版主懲處規定
版主若違規被記警告,警告兩次 就拔掉版主職權
4
不管板主的做法為何,本人已向組務版申訴板主失職
若板主刻意坦護該兩名違規者惡意破壞本人隱私,本人一定申訴到底
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.62.92.94
→
08/09 06:43, , 1F
08/09 06:43, 1F
噓
08/09 07:11, , 2F
08/09 07:11, 2F
噓
08/09 09:15, , 3F
08/09 09:15, 3F
→
08/09 09:17, , 4F
08/09 09:17, 4F
噓
08/09 09:27, , 5F
08/09 09:27, 5F
噓
08/09 09:39, , 6F
08/09 09:39, 6F
噓
08/09 09:40, , 7F
08/09 09:40, 7F
→
08/09 09:40, , 8F
08/09 09:40, 8F
噓
08/09 09:43, , 9F
08/09 09:43, 9F
→
08/09 09:45, , 10F
08/09 09:45, 10F
噓
08/09 09:55, , 11F
08/09 09:55, 11F
噓
08/09 10:05, , 12F
08/09 10:05, 12F
噓
08/09 10:33, , 13F
08/09 10:33, 13F
噓
08/09 10:40, , 14F
08/09 10:40, 14F
噓
08/09 10:49, , 15F
08/09 10:49, 15F
→
08/09 10:53, , 16F
08/09 10:53, 16F
→
08/09 10:53, , 17F
08/09 10:53, 17F
→
08/09 10:53, , 18F
08/09 10:53, 18F
→
08/09 10:54, , 19F
08/09 10:54, 19F
→
08/09 10:54, , 20F
08/09 10:54, 20F
→
08/09 10:55, , 21F
08/09 10:55, 21F
→
08/09 10:55, , 22F
08/09 10:55, 22F
噓
08/09 11:09, , 23F
08/09 11:09, 23F
噓
08/09 11:09, , 24F
08/09 11:09, 24F
噓
08/09 11:11, , 25F
08/09 11:11, 25F
噓
08/09 11:13, , 26F
08/09 11:13, 26F
→
08/09 11:13, , 27F
08/09 11:13, 27F
噓
08/09 11:13, , 28F
08/09 11:13, 28F
→
08/09 11:14, , 29F
08/09 11:14, 29F
噓
08/09 11:16, , 30F
08/09 11:16, 30F
→
08/09 11:16, , 31F
08/09 11:16, 31F
→
08/09 11:19, , 32F
08/09 11:19, 32F
→
08/09 11:20, , 33F
08/09 11:20, 33F
噓
08/09 11:21, , 34F
08/09 11:21, 34F
噓
08/09 11:24, , 35F
08/09 11:24, 35F
噓
08/09 11:25, , 36F
08/09 11:25, 36F
→
08/09 11:31, , 37F
08/09 11:31, 37F
→
08/09 11:32, , 38F
08/09 11:32, 38F
噓
08/09 11:42, , 39F
08/09 11:42, 39F
還有 159 則推文
還有 1 段內文
→
08/11 08:36, , 199F
08/11 08:36, 199F
噓
08/11 09:13, , 200F
08/11 09:13, 200F
噓
08/11 09:18, , 201F
08/11 09:18, 201F
噓
08/11 09:18, , 202F
08/11 09:18, 202F
噓
08/11 09:21, , 203F
08/11 09:21, 203F
噓
08/11 09:40, , 204F
08/11 09:40, 204F
→
08/11 09:59, , 205F
08/11 09:59, 205F
→
08/11 09:59, , 206F
08/11 09:59, 206F
→
08/11 10:00, , 207F
08/11 10:00, 207F
噓
08/11 10:05, , 208F
08/11 10:05, 208F
→
08/11 10:09, , 209F
08/11 10:09, 209F
→
08/11 10:10, , 210F
08/11 10:10, 210F
→
08/11 10:39, , 211F
08/11 10:39, 211F
→
08/11 10:40, , 212F
08/11 10:40, 212F
→
08/11 12:13, , 213F
08/11 12:13, 213F
噓
08/11 12:42, , 214F
08/11 12:42, 214F
噓
08/11 14:18, , 215F
08/11 14:18, 215F
噓
08/11 14:26, , 216F
08/11 14:26, 216F
噓
08/11 14:48, , 217F
08/11 14:48, 217F
噓
08/11 15:01, , 218F
08/11 15:01, 218F
→
08/11 15:08, , 219F
08/11 15:08, 219F
→
08/11 16:05, , 220F
08/11 16:05, 220F
→
08/11 16:05, , 221F
08/11 16:05, 221F
→
08/11 16:15, , 222F
08/11 16:15, 222F
→
08/11 16:16, , 223F
08/11 16:16, 223F
→
08/11 16:17, , 224F
08/11 16:17, 224F
噓
08/11 16:40, , 225F
08/11 16:40, 225F
噓
08/11 18:28, , 226F
08/11 18:28, 226F
噓
08/11 18:30, , 227F
08/11 18:30, 227F
噓
08/11 20:02, , 228F
08/11 20:02, 228F
噓
08/12 00:29, , 229F
08/12 00:29, 229F
噓
08/12 00:43, , 230F
08/12 00:43, 230F
→
08/12 17:18, , 231F
08/12 17:18, 231F
噓
08/13 12:37, , 232F
08/13 12:37, 232F
噓
08/14 09:49, , 233F
08/14 09:49, 233F
噓
08/14 11:13, , 234F
08/14 11:13, 234F
噓
08/15 20:05, , 235F
08/15 20:05, 235F
噓
08/17 01:58, , 236F
08/17 01:58, 236F
噓
08/28 20:07, , 237F
08/28 20:07, 237F
噓
09/07 22:10, , 238F
09/07 22:10, 238F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 12 篇):
Anti-ramp 近期熱門文章
PTT消費區 即時熱門文章