[硬式] 向liam1984版友討教角膜術型ok鏡!
看板Contacts (隱形眼鏡)作者s9306302100 (Johnson 222)時間8年前 (2016/03/15 22:28)推噓-8(10推 18噓 134→)留言162則, 8人參與討論串1/1
我一開始是很只針對角膜塑形術明白敘述ok鏡是安全且在ㄧ定範圍內近視散光中可有效矯
正屈光不正問題且可控制近視的增加,你持否定的態度,單純想問你是有醫學或視光背景
如何證明你的論斷?你扯什麼驗配人員怎樣很缺德?價錢怎樣?請問你有事嗎?結果你沒
任何醫學或視光背景然後只是在這胡言亂語呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.161.53.250
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Contacts/M.1458052098.A.623.html
噓
03/15 22:46, , 1F
03/15 22:46, 1F
→
03/15 22:46, , 2F
03/15 22:46, 2F
→
03/15 22:46, , 3F
03/15 22:46, 3F
→
03/15 22:46, , 4F
03/15 22:46, 4F
→
03/15 22:46, , 5F
03/15 22:46, 5F
我以表明我的身份了啊,我就只是個消費者,我只是很好奇不管在怡碩或聚英或其他眼科
醫院或其他視光學博士發表的評論中對角膜塑形術都持正面且有效的!請問你所說的會有
問題是什麼問題呢?(眼睛本身有疾病或超過驗配度數就不用講了)還有硬式特殊情況才
建議驗配請問是什麼特殊情況呢?以我知道的ok鏡與一般日戴型的硬式設計是完全不一樣
的,你說只有dk值不一樣!請問有相關資料可po上來打臉我嗎?不用再扯別的有的沒的單
純想請教請教!
http://i.imgur.com/fP47hrf.jpg
※ 編輯: s9306302100 (118.161.53.250), 03/15/2016 23:13:15
推
03/16 00:08, , 6F
03/16 00:08, 6F
→
03/16 00:08, , 7F
03/16 00:08, 7F
→
03/16 00:08, , 8F
03/16 00:08, 8F
→
03/16 00:08, , 9F
03/16 00:08, 9F
→
03/16 00:08, , 10F
03/16 00:08, 10F
→
03/16 00:08, , 11F
03/16 00:08, 11F
→
03/16 00:08, , 12F
03/16 00:08, 12F
→
03/16 00:08, , 13F
03/16 00:08, 13F
→
03/16 00:08, , 14F
03/16 00:08, 14F
→
03/16 00:08, , 15F
03/16 00:08, 15F
→
03/16 00:08, , 16F
03/16 00:08, 16F
→
03/16 00:08, , 17F
03/16 00:08, 17F
→
03/16 00:08, , 18F
03/16 00:08, 18F
→
03/16 00:08, , 19F
03/16 00:08, 19F
→
03/16 00:08, , 20F
03/16 00:08, 20F
→
03/16 00:08, , 21F
03/16 00:08, 21F
→
03/16 00:08, , 22F
03/16 00:08, 22F
→
03/16 00:08, , 23F
03/16 00:08, 23F
推
03/16 00:12, , 24F
03/16 00:12, 24F
→
03/16 00:12, , 25F
03/16 00:12, 25F
→
03/16 00:12, , 26F
03/16 00:12, 26F
→
03/16 00:12, , 27F
03/16 00:12, 27F
→
03/16 00:12, , 28F
03/16 00:12, 28F
→
03/16 00:12, , 29F
03/16 00:12, 29F
推
03/16 00:27, , 30F
03/16 00:27, 30F
→
03/16 00:27, , 31F
03/16 00:27, 31F
→
03/16 00:27, , 32F
03/16 00:27, 32F
→
03/16 00:27, , 33F
03/16 00:27, 33F
→
03/16 00:27, , 34F
03/16 00:27, 34F
→
03/16 00:27, , 35F
03/16 00:27, 35F
→
03/16 00:27, , 36F
03/16 00:27, 36F
→
03/16 00:27, , 37F
03/16 00:27, 37F
→
03/16 00:27, , 38F
03/16 00:27, 38F
還有 87 則推文
還有 6 段內文
推
03/16 08:52, , 126F
03/16 08:52, 126F
→
03/16 08:52, , 127F
03/16 08:52, 127F
推
03/16 09:43, , 128F
03/16 09:43, 128F
→
03/16 09:43, , 129F
03/16 09:43, 129F
回reset101大,其實鏡片成本都是非常低的,消費者認為眼鏡行賺很大,眼鏡行認為他們
賺的是技術
到今天為止政府都沒能給我們消費者一個完善驗配制度,換句話說任何阿貓阿狗都能開眼
鏡行替人驗配眼鏡,所以只能靠消費者自己做足功課,自己找口碑好及價錢合理的好店家
,或有北美視光學證照或台灣視光學系畢業,來降低自己被那些沒有知識且充滿話術的眼
鏡行給欺騙。
※ 編輯: s9306302100 (39.13.82.118), 03/16/2016 11:55:23
噓
, , 130F
→
03/16 14:53, , 131F
03/16 14:53, 131F
→
03/16 14:53, , 132F
03/16 14:53, 132F
噓
03/16 14:57, , 133F
03/16 14:57, 133F
→
03/16 14:57, , 134F
03/16 14:57, 134F
→
03/16 14:57, , 135F
03/16 14:57, 135F
→
03/16 14:57, , 136F
03/16 14:57, 136F
噓
03/16 15:06, , 137F
03/16 15:06, 137F
→
03/16 15:06, , 138F
03/16 15:06, 138F
→
03/16 15:06, , 139F
03/16 15:06, 139F
→
03/16 15:06, , 140F
03/16 15:06, 140F
噓
03/16 15:08, , 141F
03/16 15:08, 141F
→
03/16 15:08, , 142F
03/16 15:08, 142F
→
03/16 15:47, , 143F
03/16 15:47, 143F
→
03/16 15:47, , 144F
03/16 15:47, 144F
→
03/16 15:47, , 145F
03/16 15:47, 145F
→
03/16 15:47, , 146F
03/16 15:47, 146F
噓
03/16 16:13, , 147F
03/16 16:13, 147F
→
03/16 17:37, , 148F
03/16 17:37, 148F
→
03/16 17:40, , 149F
03/16 17:40, 149F
→
03/16 17:40, , 150F
03/16 17:40, 150F
推
03/16 17:57, , 151F
03/16 17:57, 151F
→
03/16 18:15, , 152F
03/16 18:15, 152F
非常抱歉,本來想說以ok鏡做討論,沒想到讓版友看到這沒水準的言論,人品與是不是專
業,相信版友心中有一把尺,我也不會再回覆此人這種沒專業沒水準的言論了。
※ 編輯: s9306302100 (118.161.50.172), 03/16/2016 18:28:31
→
03/16 19:03, , 153F
03/16 19:03, 153F
→
03/16 19:03, , 154F
03/16 19:03, 154F
噓
03/16 19:12, , 155F
03/16 19:12, 155F
推
03/16 19:24, , 156F
03/16 19:24, 156F
→
03/16 19:24, , 157F
03/16 19:24, 157F
→
03/16 19:24, , 158F
03/16 19:24, 158F
→
03/16 19:24, , 159F
03/16 19:24, 159F
噓
03/16 20:28, , 160F
03/16 20:28, 160F
→
03/16 20:28, , 161F
03/16 20:28, 161F
→
03/16 20:28, , 162F
03/16 20:28, 162F
※ 編輯: s9306302100 (118.161.50.140), 03/23/2016 20:01:33
Contacts 近期熱門文章
PTT消費區 即時熱門文章